PairBook
HomeDBGI › DBGI vs SAFT

DBGI vs SAFT: Correlation

How closely do Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI) and Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.72, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.72
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.90
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.62
long-run
Ann. covariance
25112.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DBGI and SAFT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of DBGI and SAFT correlate at 0.72, strong. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.90) runs above the 3-year figure (0.72). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.62, with an annualized covariance of 25112.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, SAFT places #9 of the 28 assets tracked against DBGI. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SAFT outperformed by 78.0 percentage points (-29.2% for DBGI against +48.8% for SAFT). Note the risk asymmetry: DBGI runs 36.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DBGI vs SAFT: side by side

DBGI (Digital Brands Group, Inc.)SAFT (Safety Insurance Group, Inc.)
1-year return-29.2%+48.8%
5-year return-100.0%+58.1%
Volatility (ann.)1127.2%30.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.930.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-20.1%
Market cap$1.5B
P/E (trailing)22.3
Dividend yield0.00%3.55%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: SAFT 3.55% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SAFT -20.1% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: SAFT +58.1% vs -100.0%
-96%0%+101%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. DBGI · SAFT

Year-by-year returns

YearDBGISAFT
2022-98.2%+3.1%
2023-96.9%-5.4%
2024-98.9%+13.3%
2025+610.8%-0.8%
2026-43.1%+36.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DBGI and SAFT good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.72 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DBGI and SAFT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DBGI and SAFT is 0.72 over 3 years, 0.90 over 1 year and 0.62 over 5 years.

Is SAFT a good diversifier for DBGI?

To a limited degree. At 0.72 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?

A reading of 0.72 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dbgi-vs-saft.json

DBGI vs SAFT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.72DBGI vs SAFT0.72

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DBGI vs SAFT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dbgi-vs-saft.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dbgi-vs-saft/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DBGI correlations · SAFT correlations