PairBook
HomeCXAI › CXAI vs MNST

CXAI vs MNST: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Monster Beverage (MNST) carry a correlation of -0.58, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.58
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
-148260.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CXAI and MNST?

On 3 years of weekly data the CXAI/MNST correlation comes out at -0.58, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.62 over 1 year against -0.58 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.55, and annualized covariance runs at -148260.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against CXAI, MNST sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CXAI ahead by 432.0 points (+407.7% versus -24.3%). Note the risk asymmetry: CXAI runs 54.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CXAI vs MNST: side by side

CXAI (CXApp Inc.)MNST (Monster Beverage)
1-year return+407.7%-24.3%
5-year return-60.0%-4.5%
Volatility (ann.)3738.0%68.6%
Beta vs S&P 5006.690.80
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.3%-54.5%
Market cap$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -98.3%Higher 5y return: MNST -4.5% vs -60.0%
-85%0%+740%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CXAI · MNST

Year-by-year returns

YearCXAIMNST
2022+0.8%+5.7%
2023-87.2%+13.5%
2024+41.1%-8.8%
2025-81.8%+45.9%
2026+1092.8%-39.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CXAI and MNST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.58, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CXAI and MNST?

The CXAI/MNST correlation stands at -0.58 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.62, 5 years: -0.55), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MNST a good diversifier for CXAI?

Yes: at -0.58, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.58 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cxai-vs-mnst.json

CXAI vs MNST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.58CXAI vs MNST-0.58

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CXAI vs MNST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cxai-vs-mnst.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cxai-vs-mnst/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CXAI correlations · MNST correlations