CXAI vs LII: Correlation
CXApp Inc. (CXAI) and Lennox International (LII) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.40.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CXAI and LII?
On 3 years of weekly data the CXAI/LII correlation comes out at -0.40, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.56) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.40). The 5-year figure is -0.29, and annualized covariance runs at -47809.7 %².
Out of 10 assets tracked against CXAI, LII lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CXAI outperformed by 438.0 percentage points (+407.7% for CXAI against -30.3% for LII). Risk is not evenly split, since CXAI carries 116.8 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CXAI vs LII: side by side
| CXAI (CXApp Inc.) | LII (Lennox International) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +407.7% | -30.3% |
| 5-year return | -60.0% | +23.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 3738.0% | 32.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 6.69 | 0.96 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -98.3% | -41.7% |
| Market cap | – | $13.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 17.5 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.34% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CXAI | LII |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +0.8% | -24.9% |
| 2023 | -87.2% | +89.5% |
| 2024 | +41.1% | +37.3% |
| 2025 | -81.8% | -19.5% |
| 2026 | +1092.8% | -19.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CXAI and LII good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.40 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CXAI and LII?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.40 over 3 years, with -0.56 over the last year and -0.29 over 5 years.
Is LII a good diversifier for CXAI?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.40 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.40 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.40 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cxai-vs-lii.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cxai-vs-lii/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CXAI correlations · LII correlations
