PairBook
HomeCUBE › CUBE vs LH

CUBE vs LH: Correlation

How closely do CubeSmart (CUBE) and Labcorp (LH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.49
long-run
Ann. covariance
240.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CUBE and LH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CUBE and LH correlate at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.48 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.49, with an annualized covariance of 240.6 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against CUBE, LH ranks #18 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LH ahead by 18.0 points (+3.8% versus +21.8%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CUBE vs LH: side by side

CUBE (CubeSmart)LH (Labcorp)
1-year return+3.8%+21.8%
5-year return-6.2%+36.0%
Volatility (ann.)23.0%21.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.0%-17.4%
Market cap$9.0B$27.3B
P/E (trailing)27.627.8
Dividend yield5.22%0.86%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: CUBE 27.6 vs 27.8Higher yield: CUBE 5.22% vs 0.86%Smaller drawdown: LH -17.4% vs -32.0%Higher 5y return: LH +36.0% vs -6.2%
-14%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CUBE · LH

Year-by-year returns

YearCUBELH
2022-26.3%-24.4%
2023+20.5%+13.8%
2024-4.5%+2.2%
2025-11.6%+10.6%
2026+15.7%+34.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CUBE and LH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CUBE and LH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CUBE and LH is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.48 over 1 year and 0.49 over 5 years.

Is LH a good diversifier for CUBE?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cube-vs-lh.json

CUBE vs LH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49CUBE vs LH0.49

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CUBE vs LH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cube-vs-lh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cube-vs-lh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CUBE correlations · LH correlations