CUBE vs VXZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CubeSmart (CUBE) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.36, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CUBE and VXZ?
Over the past 3 years, CUBE and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.39) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.37, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -214.1 %².
VXZ is close to the least connected end of CUBE's tracked universe, ranking #24 of 24. The last year tells two different stories: CUBE led by 19.9 percentage points, +3.8% for CUBE against -16.1% for VXZ.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CUBE vs VXZ: side by side
| CUBE (CubeSmart) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +3.8% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | -6.2% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 23.0% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.63 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -32.0% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $9.0B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 27.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 5.22% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CUBE | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -26.3% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +20.5% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | -4.5% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | -11.6% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +15.7% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CUBE and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.36, CUBE and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CUBE and VXZ?
The CUBE/VXZ correlation stands at -0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.39, 5 years: -0.37), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for CUBE?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.36, CUBE and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cube-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cube-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CUBE correlations · VXZ correlations
