PairBook
HomeCUBE › CUBE vs KIM

CUBE vs KIM: Correlation

How closely do CubeSmart (CUBE) and Kimco Realty (KIM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.71, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.71
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.77
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.62
long-run
Ann. covariance
372.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CUBE and KIM?

On 3 years of weekly data the CUBE/KIM correlation comes out at 0.71, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.77 over 1 year against 0.71 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.62, and annualized covariance runs at 372.4 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against CUBE, KIM ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance KIM holds a 7.6-point edge, +3.8% against +11.4%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CUBE vs KIM: side by side

CUBE (CubeSmart)KIM (Kimco Realty)
1-year return+3.8%+11.4%
5-year return-6.2%+35.9%
Volatility (ann.)23.0%22.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.630.63
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.0%-25.9%
Market cap$9.0B$16.0B
P/E (trailing)27.628.0
Dividend yield5.22%4.29%
Sector / categoryUS ListedReal Estate
Lower P/E: CUBE 27.6 vs 28.0Higher yield: CUBE 5.22% vs 4.29%Smaller drawdown: KIM -25.9% vs -32.0%Higher 5y return: KIM +35.9% vs -6.2%
-14%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CUBE · KIM

Year-by-year returns

YearCUBEKIM
2022-26.3%-10.8%
2023+20.5%+6.1%
2024-4.5%+15.0%
2025-11.6%-9.3%
2026+15.7%+20.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CUBE and KIM good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.71 means CUBE and KIM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CUBE and KIM?

The CUBE/KIM correlation stands at 0.71 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.77, 5 years: 0.62), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KIM a good diversifier for CUBE?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.71 means CUBE and KIM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.71 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cube-vs-kim.json

CUBE vs KIM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.71CUBE vs KIM0.71

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CUBE vs KIM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cube-vs-kim.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cube-vs-kim/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CUBE correlations · KIM correlations