PairBook
HomeCTSO › CTSO vs SSM

CTSO vs SSM: Correlation

Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) and Sono Group N.V. (SSM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-27107.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTSO and SSM?

Over the past 3 years, CTSO and SSM moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.07 versus -0.30 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -27107.8 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against CTSO, SSM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Over the last 12 months SSM came out ahead by 12.9 percentage points (-63.4% against -50.5%). Note the risk asymmetry: SSM runs 15.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTSO vs SSM: side by side

CTSO (Cytosorbents Corporation)SSM (Sono Group N.V.)
1-year return-63.4%-50.5%
5-year return-96.4%-99.9%
Volatility (ann.)75.9%1204.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.980.56
Max drawdown (3Y)-87.9%-99.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CTSO -87.9% vs -99.4%Higher 5y return: CTSO -96.4% vs -99.9%
-82%0%+2%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CTSO · SSM

Year-by-year returns

YearCTSOSSM
2022-63.0%-89.8%
2023-28.4%-93.9%
2024-18.0%-16.7%
2025-29.8%+86.7%
2026-46.7%-61.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTSO and SSM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTSO and SSM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with 0.07 over the last year and -0.22 over 5 years.

Is SSM a good diversifier for CTSO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctso-vs-ssm.json

CTSO vs SSM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30CTSO vs SSM-0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CTSO vs SSM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctso-vs-ssm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctso-vs-ssm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTSO correlations · SSM correlations