PairBook
HomeCTSO › CTSO vs MRX

CTSO vs MRX: Correlation

How closely do Cytosorbents Corporation (CTSO) and Marex Group Limited (MRX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-697.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTSO and MRX?

Over the past 3 years, CTSO and MRX moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.04) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -697.1 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against CTSO, MRX lands near the bottom at #8. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MRX ahead by 163.0 points (-63.4% versus +99.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since CTSO carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTSO vs MRX: side by side

CTSO (Cytosorbents Corporation)MRX (Marex Group Limited)
1-year return-63.4%+99.6%
5-year return-96.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)75.9%39.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.980.44
Max drawdown (3Y)-87.9%-41.1%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)14.6
Dividend yield0.00%1.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MRX 1.04% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MRX -41.1% vs -87.9%
-65%0%+111%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CTSO · MRX

Year-by-year returns

YearCTSOMRX
2022-63.0%
2023-28.4%
2024-18.0%
2025-29.8%+25.1%
2026-46.7%+87.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTSO and MRX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, CTSO and MRX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTSO and MRX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTSO and MRX is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MRX a good diversifier for CTSO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, CTSO and MRX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctso-vs-mrx.json

CTSO vs MRX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24CTSO vs MRX-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CTSO vs MRX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctso-vs-mrx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctso-vs-mrx/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTSO correlations · MRX correlations