CTAS vs VRSK: Correlation
Cintas (CTAS) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.42.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CTAS and VRSK?
On 3 years of weekly data the CTAS/VRSK correlation comes out at 0.42, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.39 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.55, and annualized covariance runs at 243.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, VRSK places #25 of the 38 assets tracked against CTAS. The last year tells two different stories: CTAS led by 24.7 percentage points, -3.3% for CTAS against -28.0% for VRSK. On a rolling one-year basis the correlation drifted between 0.21 and 0.67, a moderate band.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CTAS vs VRSK: side by side
| CTAS (Cintas) | VRSK (Verisk Analytics) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -3.3% | -28.0% |
| 5-year return | +117.4% | -1.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 23.2% | 25.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.71 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -27.7% | -50.8% |
| Market cap | $81.7B | $24.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 41.8 | 28.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | 1.01% |
| Sector / category | Industrials | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CTAS | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +3.0% | -22.3% |
| 2023 | +34.8% | +36.2% |
| 2024 | +22.2% | +16.0% |
| 2025 | +3.8% | -18.2% |
| 2026 | +9.4% | -14.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CTAS and VRSK good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.42, CTAS and VRSK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CTAS and VRSK?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTAS and VRSK is 0.42 over 3 years, 0.39 over 1 year and 0.55 over 5 years.
Is VRSK a good diversifier for CTAS?
Reasonably. At 0.42, CTAS and VRSK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.42 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctas-vs-vrsk.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctas-vs-vrsk/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CTAS correlations · VRSK correlations
