PairBook
HomeCTAS › CTAS vs XLF

CTAS vs XLF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cintas (CTAS) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) carry a correlation of 0.52, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.52
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.57
long-run
Ann. covariance
196.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTAS and XLF?

On 3 years of weekly data the CTAS/XLF correlation comes out at 0.52, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.46) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.57, and annualized covariance runs at 196.2 %².

Among the 38 assets we track against CTAS, XLF ranks #10 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance XLF holds a 12.6-point edge, -3.3% against +9.3%. The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.41 and 0.66 over the past three years, a moderate range.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTAS vs XLF: side by side

CTAS (Cintas)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-3.3%+9.3%
5-year return+117.4%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)23.2%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.710.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.7%-15.5%
Market cap$81.7B
P/E (trailing)41.8
Dividend yield0.87%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryIndustrialsSector ETF
Higher yield: XLF 1.42% vs 0.87%Smaller drawdown: XLF -15.5% vs -27.7%Higher 5y return: CTAS +117.4% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-19%0%+11%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CTAS · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearCTASXLF
2022+3.0%-10.6%
2023+34.8%+12.0%
2024+22.2%+30.6%
2025+3.8%+14.9%
2026+9.4%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTAS and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTAS and XLF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTAS and XLF is 0.52 over 3 years, 0.46 over 1 year and 0.57 over 5 years.

Is XLF a good diversifier for CTAS?

To a limited degree. At 0.52 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.52 mean?

A reading of 0.52 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctas-vs-xlf.json

CTAS vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.52CTAS vs XLF0.52

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CTAS vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctas-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctas-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTAS correlations · XLF correlations