PairBook
HomeCSTL › CSTL vs VXZ

CSTL vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Castle Biosciences, Inc. (CSTL) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-364.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CSTL and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, CSTL and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.16 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -364.7 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against CSTL, VXZ lands near the bottom at #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CSTL outperformed by 69.9 percentage points (+53.8% for CSTL against -16.1% for VXZ). Note the risk asymmetry: CSTL runs 2.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CSTL vs VXZ: side by side

CSTL (Castle Biosciences, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+53.8%-16.1%
5-year return-54.0%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)64.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.79-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.8%-36.4%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -57.8%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -54.0%
-19%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CSTL · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCSTLVXZ
2022-45.1%+0.5%
2023-8.3%-44.0%
2024+23.5%-12.7%
2025+46.0%+5.7%
2026-11.9%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CSTL and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CSTL and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CSTL and VXZ?

The CSTL/VXZ correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.16, 5 years: -0.22), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CSTL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, CSTL and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cstl-vs-vxz.json

CSTL vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CSTL vs VXZ-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CSTL vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cstl-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cstl-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CSTL correlations · VXZ correlations