PairBook
HomeCSTL › CSTL vs RAY

CSTL vs RAY: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Castle Biosciences, Inc. (CSTL) and Raytech Holding Limited (RAY) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1802.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CSTL and RAY?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CSTL and RAY correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.20 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1802.2 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against CSTL, RAY sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CSTL ahead by 137.8 points (+53.8% versus -84.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: RAY runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CSTL vs RAY: side by side

CSTL (Castle Biosciences, Inc.)RAY (Raytech Holding Limited)
1-year return+53.8%-84.0%
5-year return-54.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)64.2%146.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.790.37
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.8%-97.7%
Market cap$1.0B
P/E (trailing)3.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CSTL -57.8% vs -97.7%
-82%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CSTL · RAY

Year-by-year returns

YearCSTLRAY
2022-45.1%
2023-8.3%
2024+23.5%
2025+46.0%-90.5%
2026-11.9%+36.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CSTL and RAY good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CSTL and RAY?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.20 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is RAY a good diversifier for CSTL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cstl-vs-ray.json

CSTL vs RAY: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CSTL vs RAY-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CSTL vs RAY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cstl-vs-ray.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cstl-vs-ray/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CSTL correlations · RAY correlations