PairBook
HomeCSQ › CSQ vs XLC

CSQ vs XLC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund - Closed End Fund (CSQ) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) carry a correlation of 0.79, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.79
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.72
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.76
long-run
Ann. covariance
237.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CSQ and XLC?

On 3 years of weekly data the CSQ/XLC correlation comes out at 0.79, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.72) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.76, and annualized covariance runs at 237.0 %².

Among the 51 assets we track against CSQ, XLC ranks #26 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: CSQ led by 19.9 percentage points, +21.4% for CSQ against +1.5% for XLC.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CSQ vs XLC: side by side

CSQ (Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund - Closed End Fund)XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+21.4%+1.5%
5-year return+64.2%+37.5%
Volatility (ann.)18.8%16.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.220.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-24.2%-18.0%
Market cap$3.4B
P/E (trailing)3.2
Dividend yield2.95%1.32%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$21.7B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Higher yield: CSQ 2.95% vs 1.32%Smaller drawdown: XLC -18.0% vs -24.2%Higher 5y return: CSQ +64.2% vs +37.5%

On the fund side, XLC sits in the Communications category at State Street Investment Management, with $21.7B under management, 24 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.32% trailing dividend yield.

-7%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CSQ · XLC

Year-by-year returns

YearCSQXLC
2022-24.2%-37.6%
2023+20.9%+52.8%
2024+28.2%+34.7%
2025+16.3%+23.1%
2026+14.3%-4.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CSQ and XLC good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.79 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CSQ and XLC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.79 over 3 years, with 0.72 over the last year and 0.76 over 5 years.

Is XLC a good diversifier for CSQ?

To a limited degree. At 0.79 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.79 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.79 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/csq-vs-xlc.json

CSQ vs XLC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.79CSQ vs XLC0.79

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CSQ vs XLC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/csq-vs-xlc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/csq-vs-xlc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CSQ correlations · XLC correlations