PairBook
HomeCSQ › CSQ vs VXZ

CSQ vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund - Closed End Fund (CSQ) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.71, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.71
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.72
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.66
long-run
Ann. covariance
-342.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CSQ and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CSQ and VXZ correlate at -0.71, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.72 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.66, with an annualized covariance of -342.1 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of CSQ's tracked universe, ranking #49 of 51. The last year tells two different stories: CSQ led by 37.5 percentage points, +21.4% for CSQ against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CSQ vs VXZ: side by side

CSQ (Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund - Closed End Fund)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+21.4%-16.1%
5-year return+64.2%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)18.8%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.22-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-24.2%-36.4%
Market cap$3.4B
P/E (trailing)3.2
Dividend yield2.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CSQ -24.2% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: CSQ +64.2% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CSQ · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCSQVXZ
2022-24.2%+0.5%
2023+20.9%-44.0%
2024+28.2%-12.7%
2025+16.3%+5.7%
2026+14.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CSQ and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.71 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CSQ and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CSQ and VXZ is -0.71 over 3 years, -0.72 over 1 year and -0.66 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CSQ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.71 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.71 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/csq-vs-vxz.json

CSQ vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.71CSQ vs VXZ-0.71

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CSQ vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/csq-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/csq-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CSQ correlations · VXZ correlations