CRUS vs HROW: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Harrow, Inc. (HROW) carry a correlation of 0.43, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CRUS and HROW?
On 3 years of weekly data the CRUS/HROW correlation comes out at 0.43, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.42 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.28, and annualized covariance runs at 1199.3 %².
By 3-year correlation, HROW places #9 of the 14 assets tracked against CRUS. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -5.4% against -0.6%. Risk is not evenly split, since HROW carries 2.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CRUS vs HROW: side by side
| CRUS (Cirrus Logic, Inc.) | HROW (Harrow, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -5.4% | -0.6% |
| 5-year return | +29.6% | +288.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 37.5% | 75.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.34 | 1.98 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -46.9% | -61.4% |
| Market cap | $5.6B | $1.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CRUS | HROW |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -19.1% | +70.8% |
| 2023 | +11.7% | -24.1% |
| 2024 | +19.7% | +199.6% |
| 2025 | +19.0% | +46.1% |
| 2026 | -6.4% | -21.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CRUS and HROW good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.43, CRUS and HROW keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CRUS and HROW?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CRUS and HROW is 0.43 over 3 years, 0.42 over 1 year and 0.28 over 5 years.
Is HROW a good diversifier for CRUS?
Reasonably. At 0.43, CRUS and HROW keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crus-vs-hrow.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crus-vs-hrow/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CRUS correlations · HROW correlations
