CRUS vs MPWR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) carry a correlation of 0.64, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CRUS and MPWR?
Over the past 3 years, CRUS and MPWR moved with a correlation of 0.64, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.68 over 1 year against 0.64 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.60, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1157.1 %².
MPWR is one of the assets that tracks CRUS most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 14 assets we track against CRUS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MPWR ahead by 57.8 points (-5.4% versus +52.4%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CRUS vs MPWR: side by side
| CRUS (Cirrus Logic, Inc.) | MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -5.4% | +52.4% |
| 5-year return | +29.6% | +170.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 37.5% | 48.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.34 | 2.22 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -46.9% | -51.6% |
| Market cap | $5.6B | $64.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.5 | 79.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CRUS | MPWR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -19.1% | -27.8% |
| 2023 | +11.7% | +79.8% |
| 2024 | +19.7% | -5.6% |
| 2025 | +19.0% | +54.5% |
| 2026 | -6.4% | +45.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CRUS and MPWR good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.64 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CRUS and MPWR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.64 over 3 years, with 0.68 over the last year and 0.60 over 5 years.
Is MPWR a good diversifier for CRUS?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.64 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.64 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.64 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crus-vs-mpwr.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crus-vs-mpwr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CRUS correlations · MPWR correlations
