CRM vs FICO: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Salesforce (CRM) and Fair Isaac (FICO) carry a correlation of 0.46, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CRM and FICO?
On 3 years of weekly data the CRM/FICO correlation comes out at 0.46, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.33) runs below the 3-year figure (0.46). The 5-year figure is 0.44, and annualized covariance runs at 772.7 %².
Among the 68 assets we track against CRM, FICO ranks #52 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: CRM led by 20.1 percentage points, +1.6% for CRM against -18.5% for FICO. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.35 to 0.63.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CRM vs FICO: side by side
| CRM (Salesforce) | FICO (Fair Isaac) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +1.6% | -18.5% |
| 5-year return | -3.2% | +154.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 37.6% | 45.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -58.7% | -61.3% |
| Market cap | $207.4B | $25.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 18.8 | 32.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Information Technology | Information Technology |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CRM | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -47.8% | +38.0% |
| 2023 | +98.5% | +94.5% |
| 2024 | +27.8% | +71.0% |
| 2025 | -20.2% | -15.1% |
| 2026 | -4.4% | -31.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CRM and FICO good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.46 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CRM and FICO?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.46 over 3 years, with 0.33 over the last year and 0.44 over 5 years.
Is FICO a good diversifier for CRM?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.46 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.46 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/crm-vs-fico.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/crm-vs-fico/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CRM correlations · FICO correlations
