PairBook
HomeCPHI › CPHI vs WLFC

CPHI vs WLFC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (CPHI) and Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1760.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CPHI and WLFC?

Over the past 3 years, CPHI and WLFC moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.45 versus -0.26 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1760.0 %².

Out of 16 assets tracked against CPHI, WLFC lands near the bottom at #14. The last year tells two different stories: CPHI led by 26.6 percentage points, -36.7% for CPHI against -63.3% for WLFC. One caveat on sizing: CPHI is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CPHI vs WLFC: side by side

CPHI (China Pharma Holdings, Inc.)WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation)
1-year return-36.7%-63.3%
5-year return-99.7%+47.2%
Volatility (ann.)112.2%61.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.271.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.0%-77.4%
Market cap$1.2B
P/E (trailing)13.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.88%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WLFC 0.88% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WLFC -77.4% vs -95.0%Higher 5y return: WLFC +47.2% vs -99.7%
-68%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CPHI · WLFC

Year-by-year returns

YearCPHIWLFC
2022-79.2%+56.7%
2023-88.0%-17.2%
2024-61.7%+327.3%
2025-47.4%-34.5%
2026-26.8%-59.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CPHI and WLFC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CPHI and WLFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CPHI and WLFC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CPHI and WLFC is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.45 over 1 year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is WLFC a good diversifier for CPHI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CPHI and WLFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cphi-vs-wlfc.json

CPHI vs WLFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26CPHI vs WLFC-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CPHI vs WLFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cphi-vs-wlfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cphi-vs-wlfc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CPHI correlations · WLFC correlations