PairBook
HomeCPHI › CPHI vs GRSD

CPHI vs GRSD: Correlation

How closely do China Pharma Holdings, Inc. (CPHI) and Grandstand Limited (GRSD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1719.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CPHI and GRSD?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CPHI and GRSD correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.47) than the 3-year average (-0.29). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -1719.9 %².

GRSD is close to the least connected end of CPHI's tracked universe, ranking #16 of 16. The last year tells two different stories: CPHI led by 41.7 percentage points, -36.7% for CPHI against -78.4% for GRSD. Risk is not evenly split, since CPHI carries 2.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CPHI vs GRSD: side by side

CPHI (China Pharma Holdings, Inc.)GRSD (Grandstand Limited)
1-year return-36.7%-78.4%
5-year return-99.7%-85.5%
Volatility (ann.)112.2%53.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.270.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.0%-90.1%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GRSD -90.1% vs -95.0%Higher 5y return: GRSD -85.5% vs -99.7%
-80%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CPHI · GRSD

Year-by-year returns

YearCPHIGRSD
2022-79.2%-9.9%
2023-88.0%+6.6%
2024-61.7%+44.4%
2025-47.4%-61.2%
2026-26.8%-66.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CPHI and GRSD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CPHI and GRSD?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CPHI and GRSD is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.47 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.

Is GRSD a good diversifier for CPHI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cphi-vs-grsd.json

CPHI vs GRSD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29CPHI vs GRSD-0.29

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CPHI vs GRSD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cphi-vs-grsd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cphi-vs-grsd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CPHI correlations · GRSD correlations