PairBook
HomeCME › CME vs LEN

CME vs LEN: Correlation

CME Group (CME) and Lennar (LEN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.01
long-run
Ann. covariance
-133.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CME and LEN?

On 3 years of weekly data the CME/LEN correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.01, and annualized covariance runs at -133.0 %².

Among the 47 assets we track against CME, LEN ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CME outperformed by 43.0 percentage points (+8.1% for CME against -34.9% for LEN). The relationship is regime-dependent: the rolling one-year correlation swung between -0.31 and 0.25 over the past three years, so this pair behaves very differently depending on the market environment. Note the risk asymmetry: LEN runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CME vs LEN: side by side

CME (CME Group)LEN (Lennar)
1-year return+8.1%-34.9%
5-year return+73.9%-11.7%
Volatility (ann.)20.0%32.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.120.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.1%-54.5%
Market cap$101.0B$20.5B
P/E (trailing)23.813.7
Dividend yield1.82%2.29%
Sector / categoryFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: LEN 13.7 vs 23.8Higher yield: LEN 2.29% vs 1.82%Smaller drawdown: CME -31.1% vs -54.5%Higher 5y return: CME +73.9% vs -11.7%
-41%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CME · LEN

Year-by-year returns

YearCMELEN
2022-22.9%-20.6%
2023+31.3%+66.9%
2024+15.4%-7.3%
2025+19.8%-20.8%
2026+5.9%-15.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CME and LEN good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CME and LEN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and 0.01 over 5 years.

Is LEN a good diversifier for CME?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cme-vs-len.json

CME vs LEN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CME vs LEN-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CME vs LEN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cme-vs-len.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cme-vs-len/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CME correlations · LEN correlations