PairBook
HomeCME › CME vs DSWL

CME vs DSWL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CME Group (CME) and Deswell Industries, Inc. (DSWL) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.26
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-121.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CME and DSWL?

On 3 years of weekly data the CME/DSWL correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.26 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.09, and annualized covariance runs at -121.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, DSWL places #26 of the 47 assets tracked against CME. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CME ahead by 18.5 points (+8.1% versus -10.4%). One caveat on sizing: DSWL is 1.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CME vs DSWL: side by side

CME (CME Group)DSWL (Deswell Industries, Inc.)
1-year return+8.1%-10.4%
5-year return+73.9%+0.8%
Volatility (ann.)20.0%30.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.120.34
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.1%-29.5%
Market cap$101.0B
P/E (trailing)23.84.6
Dividend yield1.82%6.45%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: DSWL 4.6 vs 23.8Higher yield: DSWL 6.45% vs 1.82%Smaller drawdown: DSWL -29.5% vs -31.1%Higher 5y return: CME +73.9% vs +0.8%
-26%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CME · DSWL

Year-by-year returns

YearCMEDSWL
2022-22.9%-14.1%
2023+31.3%-8.3%
2024+15.4%-2.9%
2025+19.8%+54.7%
2026+5.9%-5.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CME and DSWL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CME and DSWL?

The CME/DSWL correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.26, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is DSWL a good diversifier for CME?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cme-vs-dswl.json

CME vs DSWL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CME vs DSWL-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CME vs DSWL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cme-vs-dswl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cme-vs-dswl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CME correlations · DSWL correlations