PairBook
HomeCLS › CLS vs KHC

CLS vs KHC: Correlation

Celestica, Inc. (CLS) and Kraft Heinz (KHC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-286.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLS and KHC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CLS and KHC correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.09) than the 3-year average (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -286.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, KHC places #15 of the 23 assets tracked against CLS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CLS ahead by 60.9 points (+57.0% versus -3.9%). Risk is not evenly split, since CLS carries 2.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLS vs KHC: side by side

CLS (Celestica, Inc.)KHC (Kraft Heinz)
1-year return+57.0%-3.9%
5-year return+3251.4%-10.9%
Volatility (ann.)60.6%21.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.490.12
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.0%-38.7%
Market cap$40.0B$29.8B
P/E (trailing)32.0
Dividend yield0.00%6.45%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: KHC 6.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KHC -38.7% vs -54.0%Higher 5y return: CLS +3251.4% vs -10.9%
-18%0%+73%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CLS · KHC

Year-by-year returns

YearCLSKHC
2022+1.3%+18.2%
2023+159.8%-5.0%
2024+215.2%-13.0%
2025+220.3%-16.3%
2026+7.4%+7.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLS and KHC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLS and KHC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.09 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is KHC a good diversifier for CLS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cls-vs-khc.json

CLS vs KHC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22CLS vs KHC-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CLS vs KHC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cls-vs-khc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cls-vs-khc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLS correlations · KHC correlations