PairBook
HomeCLMT › CLMT vs MPC

CLMT vs MPC: Correlation

How closely do Calumet, Inc (CLMT) and Marathon Petroleum (MPC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.64
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
896.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLMT and MPC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CLMT and MPC correlate at 0.49, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.64 versus 0.49 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.40, with an annualized covariance of 896.7 %².

Few assets follow CLMT as closely as MPC, which ranks #2 of 10 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CLMT outperformed by 75.1 percentage points (+182.9% for CLMT against +107.8% for MPC). One caveat on sizing: CLMT is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLMT vs MPC: side by side

CLMT (Calumet, Inc)MPC (Marathon Petroleum)
1-year return+182.9%+107.8%
5-year return+582.1%+589.6%
Volatility (ann.)53.8%34.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.970.48
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.9%-44.7%
Market cap$4.0B$102.1B
P/E (trailing)12.6
Dividend yield0.00%1.10%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: MPC 1.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MPC -44.7% vs -61.9%Higher 5y return: MPC +589.6% vs +582.1%
-9%0%+175%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CLMT · MPC

Year-by-year returns

YearCLMTMPC
2022+27.9%+86.6%
2023+5.9%+30.5%
2024+23.2%-4.1%
2025-9.8%+19.2%
2026+130.3%+126.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLMT and MPC good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.49, CLMT and MPC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLMT and MPC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.49 over 3 years, with 0.64 over the last year and 0.40 over 5 years.

Is MPC a good diversifier for CLMT?

Reasonably. At 0.49, CLMT and MPC keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

A reading of 0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clmt-vs-mpc.json

CLMT vs MPC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49CLMT vs MPC0.49

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CLMT vs MPC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/clmt-vs-mpc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clmt-vs-mpc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLMT correlations · MPC correlations