PairBook
HomeCLMB › CLMB vs UMBF

CLMB vs UMBF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) carry a correlation of 0.47, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.47
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
602.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLMB and UMBF?

On 3 years of weekly data the CLMB/UMBF correlation comes out at 0.47, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.48 over 1 year against 0.47 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.29, and annualized covariance runs at 602.8 %².

UMBF is one of the assets that tracks CLMB most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 10 assets we track against CLMB. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with UMBF ahead by 25.9 points (-6.7% versus +19.2%). One caveat on sizing: CLMB is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLMB vs UMBF: side by side

CLMB (Climb Global Solutions, Inc.)UMBF (UMB Financial Corporation)
1-year return-6.7%+19.2%
5-year return+361.0%+73.4%
Volatility (ann.)45.3%28.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.041.01
Max drawdown (3Y)-53.4%-31.8%
Market cap$0.5B$11.0B
P/E (trailing)25.011.9
Dividend yield0.33%1.18%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: UMBF 11.9 vs 25.0Higher yield: UMBF 1.18% vs 0.33%Smaller drawdown: UMBF -31.8% vs -53.4%Higher 5y return: CLMB +361.0% vs +73.4%
-41%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CLMB · UMBF

Year-by-year returns

YearCLMBUMBF
2022-8.3%-20.0%
2023+76.6%+2.2%
2024+133.3%+37.3%
2025-18.4%+3.4%
2026+13.0%+26.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLMB and UMBF good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.47, CLMB and UMBF keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLMB and UMBF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CLMB and UMBF is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.48 over 1 year and 0.29 over 5 years.

Is UMBF a good diversifier for CLMB?

Reasonably. At 0.47, CLMB and UMBF keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clmb-vs-umbf.json

CLMB vs UMBF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.47CLMB vs UMBF0.47

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CLMB vs UMBF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/clmb-vs-umbf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clmb-vs-umbf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLMB correlations · UMBF correlations