CLMB vs RVLV: Correlation
Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) and Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.46.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CLMB and RVLV?
Over the past 3 years, CLMB and RVLV moved with a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.18) than the 3-year average (0.46). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.38, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1123.3 %².
Among the 10 assets we track against CLMB, RVLV ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives RVLV the advantage: -6.7% versus +0.1%, a 6.8-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CLMB vs RVLV: side by side
| CLMB (Climb Global Solutions, Inc.) | RVLV (Revolve Group, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -6.7% | +0.1% |
| 5-year return | +361.0% | -59.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 45.3% | 54.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.04 | 1.64 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -53.4% | -56.0% |
| Market cap | $0.5B | $1.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.0 | 23.0 |
| Dividend yield | 0.33% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CLMB | RVLV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -8.3% | -60.3% |
| 2023 | +76.6% | -25.5% |
| 2024 | +133.3% | +102.0% |
| 2025 | -18.4% | -9.9% |
| 2026 | +13.0% | -23.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CLMB and RVLV good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.46, CLMB and RVLV keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CLMB and RVLV?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CLMB and RVLV is 0.46 over 3 years, 0.18 over 1 year and 0.38 over 5 years.
Is RVLV a good diversifier for CLMB?
Reasonably. At 0.46, CLMB and RVLV keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?
A reading of 0.46 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clmb-vs-rvlv.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clmb-vs-rvlv/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CLMB correlations · RVLV correlations
