CLBT vs INTA: Correlation
How closely do Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and Intapp, Inc. (INTA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CLBT and INTA?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CLBT and INTA correlate at 0.47, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.54 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.34, with an annualized covariance of 1347.7 %².
INTA is one of the assets that tracks CLBT most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 12 assets we track against CLBT. The last year tells two different stories: INTA led by 17.6 percentage points, -25.4% for CLBT against -7.8% for INTA.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CLBT vs INTA: side by side
| CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.) | INTA (Intapp, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -25.4% | -7.8% |
| 5-year return | +22.2% | +24.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 52.1% | 55.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.97 | 1.45 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -59.8% | -74.2% |
| Market cap | $3.1B | $3.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 51.2 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CLBT | INTA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -45.6% | -0.9% |
| 2023 | +98.6% | +52.4% |
| 2024 | +154.4% | +68.6% |
| 2025 | -18.2% | -28.5% |
| 2026 | -31.8% | -4.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CLBT and INTA good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CLBT and INTA?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CLBT and INTA is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.54 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.
Is INTA a good diversifier for CLBT?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clbt-vs-inta.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clbt-vs-inta/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CLBT correlations · INTA correlations
