PairBook
HomeCLBT › CLBT vs FNGD

CLBT vs FNGD: Correlation

How closely do Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1202.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CLBT and FNGD?

Over the past 3 years, CLBT and FNGD moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.30 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.36, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1202.3 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against CLBT, FNGD lands near the bottom at #10. The last year tells two different stories: CLBT led by 30.3 percentage points, -25.4% for CLBT against -55.7% for FNGD.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CLBT vs FNGD: side by side

CLBT (Cellebrite DI Ltd.)FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)
1-year return-25.4%-55.7%
5-year return+22.2%-99.4%
Volatility (ann.)52.1%75.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.97-4.54
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.8%-97.6%
Market cap$3.1B
P/E (trailing)51.220.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FNGD 20.6 vs 51.2Smaller drawdown: CLBT -59.8% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: CLBT +22.2% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CLBT · FNGD

Year-by-year returns

YearCLBTFNGD
2022-45.6%+52.2%
2023+98.6%-90.1%
2024+154.4%-76.6%
2025-18.2%-61.4%
2026-31.8%-49.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CLBT and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, CLBT and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CLBT and FNGD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with -0.30 over the last year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is FNGD a good diversifier for CLBT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, CLBT and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clbt-vs-fngd.json

CLBT vs FNGD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30CLBT vs FNGD-0.30

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CLBT vs FNGD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/clbt-vs-fngd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clbt-vs-fngd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CLBT correlations · FNGD correlations