CINF vs UZX: Correlation
Cincinnati Financial (CINF) and Linkage Global Inc - Class A (UZX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CINF and UZX?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CINF and UZX correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.38 versus -0.24 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -722.0 %².
UZX is close to the least connected end of CINF's tracked universe, ranking #46 of 49. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CINF outperformed by 109.1 percentage points (+14.5% for CINF against -94.6% for UZX). Risk is not evenly split, since UZX carries 6.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CINF vs UZX: side by side
| CINF (Cincinnati Financial) | UZX (Linkage Global Inc - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +14.5% | -94.6% |
| 5-year return | +58.8% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 21.6% | 137.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.36 | 0.09 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -20.0% | -99.8% |
| Market cap | $26.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CINF | UZX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -7.9% | – |
| 2023 | +4.0% | – |
| 2024 | +42.5% | -71.7% |
| 2025 | +16.3% | -58.8% |
| 2026 | +6.8% | -93.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CINF and UZX good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CINF and UZX?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is UZX a good diversifier for CINF?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cinf-vs-uzx.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cinf-vs-uzx/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CINF correlations · UZX correlations
