CINF vs PSIG: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cincinnati Financial (CINF) and PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CINF and PSIG?
On 3 years of weekly data the CINF/PSIG correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.27 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -892.3 %².
Among the 49 assets we track against CINF, PSIG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #47. The last year tells two different stories: CINF led by 68.4 percentage points, +14.5% for CINF against -53.9% for PSIG. Risk is not evenly split, since PSIG carries 7.3 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CINF vs PSIG: side by side
| CINF (Cincinnati Financial) | PSIG (PS International Group Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +14.5% | -53.9% |
| 5-year return | +58.8% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 21.6% | 157.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.36 | 0.97 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -20.0% | -96.0% |
| Market cap | $26.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CINF | PSIG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -7.9% | – |
| 2023 | +4.0% | – |
| 2024 | +42.5% | – |
| 2025 | +16.3% | +8.3% |
| 2026 | +6.8% | -62.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CINF and PSIG good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CINF and PSIG?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CINF and PSIG is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.27 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is PSIG a good diversifier for CINF?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cinf-vs-psig.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cinf-vs-psig/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CINF correlations · PSIG correlations
