PairBook
HomeCINF › CINF vs RIME

CINF vs RIME: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cincinnati Financial (CINF) and Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) carry a correlation of -0.18, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-779.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CINF and RIME?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CINF and RIME correlate at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.25 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -779.7 %².

Among the 49 assets we track against CINF, RIME ranks #42 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CINF ahead by 101.1 points (+14.5% versus -86.6%). One caveat on sizing: RIME is 9.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CINF vs RIME: side by side

CINF (Cincinnati Financial)RIME (Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+14.5%-86.6%
5-year return+58.8%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)21.6%197.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.36-0.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.0%-99.9%
Market cap$26.5B
P/E (trailing)8.1
Dividend yield2.10%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: CINF 2.10% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CINF -20.0% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: CINF +58.8% vs -100.0%
-86%0%+75%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CINF · RIME

Year-by-year returns

YearCINFRIME
2022-7.9%-43.3%
2023+4.0%-77.1%
2024+42.5%-91.1%
2025+16.3%-94.4%
2026+6.8%-72.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CINF and RIME good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CINF and RIME?

The CINF/RIME correlation stands at -0.18 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.25, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RIME a good diversifier for CINF?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.18 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cinf-vs-rime.json

CINF vs RIME: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18CINF vs RIME-0.18

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CINF vs RIME correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cinf-vs-rime.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cinf-vs-rime/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CINF correlations · RIME correlations