CINF vs EG: Correlation
How closely do Cincinnati Financial (CINF) and Everest Group (EG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.49, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CINF and EG?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CINF and EG correlate at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.50 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.51, with an annualized covariance of 235.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, EG places #33 of the 49 assets tracked against CINF. Their 12-month results are close: +14.5% for CINF against +11.3% for EG. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.32 to 0.61.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CINF vs EG: side by side
| CINF (Cincinnati Financial) | EG (Everest Group) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +14.5% | +11.3% |
| 5-year return | +58.8% | +57.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 21.6% | 22.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -20.0% | -23.8% |
| Market cap | $26.5B | $14.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.1 | 8.0 |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 2.11% |
| Sector / category | Financials | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CINF | EG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -7.9% | +23.7% |
| 2023 | +4.0% | +8.7% |
| 2024 | +42.5% | +4.6% |
| 2025 | +16.3% | -5.3% |
| 2026 | +6.8% | +12.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CINF and EG good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CINF and EG?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CINF and EG is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.50 over 1 year and 0.51 over 5 years.
Is EG a good diversifier for CINF?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cinf-vs-eg.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cinf-vs-eg/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CINF correlations · EG correlations
