PairBook
HomeCHW › CHW vs EWJ

CHW vs EWJ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund - Closed End Fund (CHW) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) carry a correlation of 0.72, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.72
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.72
long-run
Ann. covariance
263.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHW and EWJ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHW and EWJ correlate at 0.72, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.68 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.72, with an annualized covariance of 263.0 %².

Among the 17 assets we track against CHW, EWJ ranks #12 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: +26.8% for CHW against +27.1% for EWJ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHW vs EWJ: side by side

CHW (Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund - Closed End Fund)EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF)
1-year return+26.8%+27.1%
5-year return+27.6%+58.6%
Volatility (ann.)18.6%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.050.94
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.4%-14.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)3.0
Dividend yield7.03%3.86%
Expense ratio0.49%
Assets under management$21.8B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · International
Higher yield: CHW 7.03% vs 3.86%Smaller drawdown: EWJ -14.7% vs -20.4%Higher 5y return: EWJ +58.6% vs +27.6%

EWJ, iShares's Japan Stock fund, carries $21.8B under management, 168 holdings, a 0.49% expense ratio, a 3.86% trailing dividend yield.

-1%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CHW · EWJ

Year-by-year returns

YearCHWEWJ
2022-37.7%-17.7%
2023+14.5%+20.3%
2024+27.8%+7.0%
2025+19.6%+25.8%
2026+20.8%+19.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHW and EWJ good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.72 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHW and EWJ?

The CHW/EWJ correlation stands at 0.72 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.68, 5 years: 0.72), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is EWJ a good diversifier for CHW?

To a limited degree. At 0.72 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?

A reading of 0.72 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chw-vs-ewj.json

CHW vs EWJ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.72CHW vs EWJ0.72

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CHW vs EWJ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chw-vs-ewj.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chw-vs-ewj/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHW correlations · EWJ correlations