PairBook
HomeCHW › CHW vs VXZ

CHW vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund - Closed End Fund (CHW) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.57, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.57
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.60
long-run
Ann. covariance
-272.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHW and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the CHW/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.57, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.54 over 1 year against -0.57 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.60, and annualized covariance runs at -272.3 %².

Among the 17 assets we track against CHW, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #15. The last year tells two different stories: CHW led by 42.9 percentage points, +26.8% for CHW against -16.1% for VXZ.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHW vs VXZ: side by side

CHW (Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund - Closed End Fund)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+26.8%-16.1%
5-year return+27.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)18.6%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.05-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.4%-36.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)3.0
Dividend yield7.03%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CHW -20.4% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: CHW +27.6% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CHW · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCHWVXZ
2022-37.7%+0.5%
2023+14.5%-44.0%
2024+27.8%-12.7%
2025+19.6%+5.7%
2026+20.8%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHW and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.57, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHW and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CHW and VXZ is -0.57 over 3 years, -0.54 over 1 year and -0.60 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CHW?

Yes: at -0.57, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.57 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.57 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chw-vs-vxz.json

CHW vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.57CHW vs VXZ-0.57

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CHW vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chw-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chw-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHW correlations · VXZ correlations