PairBook
HomeCHW › CHW vs EEM

CHW vs EEM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund - Closed End Fund (CHW) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) carry a correlation of 0.78, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.78
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.76
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.73
long-run
Ann. covariance
258.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHW and EEM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHW and EEM correlate at 0.78, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.76 over 1 year against 0.78 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.73, with an annualized covariance of 258.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, EEM places #8 of the 17 assets tracked against CHW. The trailing year gives EEM the advantage: +26.8% versus +38.1%, a 11.3-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHW vs EEM: side by side

CHW (Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund - Closed End Fund)EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF)
1-year return+26.8%+38.1%
5-year return+27.6%+47.1%
Volatility (ann.)18.6%18.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.050.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-20.4%-17.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)3.0
Dividend yield7.03%1.73%
Expense ratio0.72%
Assets under management$29.2B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · International
Higher yield: CHW 7.03% vs 1.73%Smaller drawdown: EEM -17.3% vs -20.4%Higher 5y return: EEM +47.1% vs +27.6%

EEM is a Diversified Emerging Mkts fund from iShares: $29.2B under management, 968 holdings, a 0.72% expense ratio, a 1.73% trailing dividend yield.

0%+43%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CHW · EEM

Year-by-year returns

YearCHWEEM
2022-37.7%-20.6%
2023+14.5%+8.9%
2024+27.8%+6.5%
2025+19.6%+34.0%
2026+20.8%+24.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHW and EEM good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.78 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHW and EEM?

The CHW/EEM correlation stands at 0.78 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.76, 5 years: 0.73), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is EEM a good diversifier for CHW?

To a limited degree. At 0.78 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.78 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chw-vs-eem.json

CHW vs EEM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.78CHW vs EEM0.78

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CHW vs EEM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chw-vs-eem.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chw-vs-eem/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHW correlations · EEM correlations