CHT vs VXZ: Correlation
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CHT and VXZ?
Over the past 3 years, CHT and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.16, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.10 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.25, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -49.4 %².
Out of 11 assets tracked against CHT, VXZ lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CHT outperformed by 17.7 percentage points (+1.6% for CHT against -16.1% for VXZ). Note the risk asymmetry: VXZ runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CHT vs VXZ: side by side
| CHT (Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +1.6% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +29.5% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 11.9% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.20 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -11.0% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $33.3B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 26.9 | – |
| Dividend yield | 12.12% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CHT | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.0% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +11.1% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +0.2% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +14.9% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +7.1% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CHT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CHT and VXZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.10 over the last year and -0.25 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for CHT?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cht-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cht-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CHT correlations · VXZ correlations
