PairBook
HomeCHT › CHT vs IEFA

CHT vs IEFA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.46
long-run
Ann. covariance
68.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHT and IEFA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHT and IEFA correlate at 0.39, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.29) runs below the 3-year figure (0.39). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.46, with an annualized covariance of 68.8 %².

Few assets follow CHT as closely as IEFA, which ranks #2 of 11 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IEFA outperformed by 20.2 percentage points (+1.6% for CHT against +21.8% for IEFA).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHT vs IEFA: side by side

CHT (Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.)IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF)
1-year return+1.6%+21.8%
5-year return+29.5%+54.5%
Volatility (ann.)11.9%15.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.200.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-11.0%-13.8%
Market cap$33.3B
P/E (trailing)26.9
Dividend yield12.12%3.35%
Expense ratio0.07%
Assets under management$190.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · International
Higher yield: CHT 12.12% vs 3.35%Smaller drawdown: CHT -11.0% vs -13.8%Higher 5y return: IEFA +54.5% vs +29.5%

IEFA, iShares's Foreign Large Blend fund, carries $190.1B under management, 1620 holdings, a 0.07% expense ratio, a 3.35% trailing dividend yield.

-7%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CHT · IEFA

Year-by-year returns

YearCHTIEFA
2022-10.0%-15.2%
2023+11.1%+18.0%
2024+0.2%+3.3%
2025+14.9%+32.1%
2026+7.1%+14.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHT and IEFA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHT and IEFA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CHT and IEFA is 0.39 over 3 years, 0.29 over 1 year and 0.46 over 5 years.

Is IEFA a good diversifier for CHT?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cht-vs-iefa.json

CHT vs IEFA: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39CHT vs IEFA0.39

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CHT vs IEFA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cht-vs-iefa.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cht-vs-iefa/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHT correlations · IEFA correlations