PairBook
HomeCHCI › CHCI vs UMAC

CHCI vs UMAC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) and Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3398.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHCI and UMAC?

On 3 years of weekly data the CHCI/UMAC correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.21) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -3398.2 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against CHCI, UMAC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months UMAC outperformed by 143.0 percentage points (+14.1% for CHCI against +157.1% for UMAC). Note the risk asymmetry: UMAC runs 4.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHCI vs UMAC: side by side

CHCI (Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.)UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc.)
1-year return+14.1%+157.1%
5-year return+236.2%n/a
Volatility (ann.)56.1%248.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.233.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.9%-75.6%
Market cap$0.2B$1.3B
P/E (trailing)8.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CHCI -47.9% vs -75.6%
-41%0%+256%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CHCI · UMAC

Year-by-year returns

YearCHCIUMAC
2022-12.4%
2023+4.2%
2024+82.4%
2025+43.8%-24.3%
2026+71.0%+106.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHCI and UMAC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHCI and UMAC?

The CHCI/UMAC correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.21, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is UMAC a good diversifier for CHCI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chci-vs-umac.json

CHCI vs UMAC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CHCI vs UMAC-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CHCI vs UMAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chci-vs-umac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chci-vs-umac/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHCI correlations · UMAC correlations