PairBook
HomeCHCI › CHCI vs MSGM

CHCI vs MSGM: Correlation

How closely do Comstock Holding Companies, Inc. (CHCI) and Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.30, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.30
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
2730.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CHCI and MSGM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CHCI and MSGM correlate at 0.30, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.22 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.25, with an annualized covariance of 2730.1 %².

MSGM is one of the assets that tracks CHCI most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 10 assets we track against CHCI. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MSGM outperformed by 19.9 percentage points (+14.1% for CHCI against +34.0% for MSGM). Risk is not evenly split, since MSGM carries 2.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CHCI vs MSGM: side by side

CHCI (Comstock Holding Companies, Inc.)MSGM (Motorsport Games Inc.)
1-year return+14.1%+34.0%
5-year return+236.2%-96.2%
Volatility (ann.)56.1%159.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.23-0.11
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.9%-81.5%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)8.413.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: CHCI 8.4 vs 13.4Smaller drawdown: CHCI -47.9% vs -81.5%Higher 5y return: CHCI +236.2% vs -96.2%
-41%0%+65%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CHCI · MSGM

Year-by-year returns

YearCHCIMSGM
2022-12.4%-87.8%
2023+4.2%-25.5%
2024+82.4%-56.6%
2025+43.8%+136.6%
2026+71.0%+23.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CHCI and MSGM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.30 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CHCI and MSGM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CHCI and MSGM is 0.30 over 3 years, 0.22 over 1 year and 0.25 over 5 years.

Is MSGM a good diversifier for CHCI?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.30 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/chci-vs-msgm.json

CHCI vs MSGM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.30CHCI vs MSGM0.30

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CHCI vs MSGM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/chci-vs-msgm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/chci-vs-msgm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CHCI correlations · MSGM correlations