PairBook
HomeCFG › CFG vs NTRS

CFG vs NTRS: Correlation

How closely do Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and Northern Trust (NTRS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.74, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.74
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.64
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.72
long-run
Ann. covariance
543.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CFG and NTRS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CFG and NTRS correlate at 0.74, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.64) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.72, with an annualized covariance of 543.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, NTRS places #23 of the 46 assets tracked against CFG. On 12-month performance NTRS holds a 5.5-point edge, +39.3% against +44.8%. The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.58 and 0.85 over the past three years, a moderate range.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CFG vs NTRS: side by side

CFG (Citizens Financial Group)NTRS (Northern Trust)
1-year return+39.3%+44.8%
5-year return+98.3%+83.2%
Volatility (ann.)31.0%23.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.161.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.1%-25.2%
Market cap$29.6B$34.1B
P/E (trailing)15.416.1
Dividend yield2.55%1.71%
Sector / categoryFinancialsFinancials
Lower P/E: CFG 15.4 vs 16.1Higher yield: CFG 2.55% vs 1.71%Smaller drawdown: NTRS -25.2% vs -29.1%Higher 5y return: CFG +98.3% vs +83.2%
-5%0%+53%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CFG · NTRS

Year-by-year returns

YearCFGNTRS
2022-13.4%-23.8%
2023-11.0%-1.0%
2024+38.0%+25.6%
2025+38.6%+36.9%
2026+22.7%+37.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CFG and NTRS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.74 means CFG and NTRS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CFG and NTRS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.74 over 3 years, with 0.64 over the last year and 0.72 over 5 years.

Is NTRS a good diversifier for CFG?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.74 means CFG and NTRS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.74 mean?

A reading of 0.74 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cfg-vs-ntrs.json

CFG vs NTRS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.74CFG vs NTRS0.74

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CFG vs NTRS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cfg-vs-ntrs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cfg-vs-ntrs/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CFG correlations · NTRS correlations