PairBook
HomeCFG › CFG vs VXZ

CFG vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.60, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.60
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.56
long-run
Ann. covariance
-476.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CFG and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CFG and VXZ correlate at -0.60, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.48) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.60). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.56, with an annualized covariance of -476.5 %².

Out of 46 assets tracked against CFG, VXZ lands near the bottom at #46. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CFG ahead by 55.4 points (+39.3% versus -16.1%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CFG vs VXZ: side by side

CFG (Citizens Financial Group)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+39.3%-16.1%
5-year return+98.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)31.0%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.16-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.1%-36.4%
Market cap$29.6B
P/E (trailing)15.4
Dividend yield2.55%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CFG -29.1% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: CFG +98.3% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CFG · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCFGVXZ
2022-13.4%+0.5%
2023-11.0%-44.0%
2024+38.0%-12.7%
2025+38.6%+5.7%
2026+22.7%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CFG and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.60, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CFG and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.60 over 3 years, with -0.48 over the last year and -0.56 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CFG?

Yes: at -0.60, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.60 mean?

A reading of -0.60 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cfg-vs-vxz.json

CFG vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.60CFG vs VXZ-0.60

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CFG vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cfg-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cfg-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CFG correlations · VXZ correlations