CFG vs LANV: Correlation
Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and Lanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.14.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CFG and LANV?
Over the past 3 years, CFG and LANV moved with a correlation of -0.14, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.21) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.09, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -305.7 %².
Among the 46 assets we track against CFG, LANV ranks #37 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: CFG led by 89.8 percentage points, +39.3% for CFG against -50.5% for LANV. Risk is not evenly split, since LANV carries 2.2 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CFG vs LANV: side by side
| CFG (Citizens Financial Group) | LANV (Lanvin Group Holdings Limited) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +39.3% | -50.5% |
| 5-year return | +98.3% | -89.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 31.0% | 69.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.16 | -0.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -29.1% | -78.6% |
| Market cap | $29.6B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 15.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.55% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Financials | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CFG | LANV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -13.4% | -6.1% |
| 2023 | -11.0% | -67.7% |
| 2024 | +38.0% | -31.9% |
| 2025 | +38.6% | +0.0% |
| 2026 | +22.7% | -50.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CFG and LANV good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CFG and LANV?
The CFG/LANV correlation stands at -0.14 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.21, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LANV a good diversifier for CFG?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.14 mean?
A reading of -0.14 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cfg-vs-lanv.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cfg-vs-lanv/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CFG correlations · LANV correlations
