PairBook
HomeCF › CF vs MLM

CF vs MLM: Correlation

How closely do CF Industries (CF) and Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-178.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CF and MLM?

Over the past 3 years, CF and MLM moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.53 versus -0.23 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.02, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -178.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, MLM places #43 of the 50 assets tracked against CF. The last year tells two different stories: CF led by 62.4 percentage points, +48.6% for CF against -13.8% for MLM. Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from -0.54 to 0.26.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CF vs MLM: side by side

CF (CF Industries)MLM (Martin Marietta Materials)
1-year return+48.6%-13.8%
5-year return+211.5%+42.4%
Volatility (ann.)32.8%23.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.200.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.2%-26.8%
Market cap$19.0B$37.5B
P/E (trailing)9.334.4
Dividend yield1.59%0.62%
Sector / categoryMaterialsMaterials
Lower P/E: CF 9.3 vs 34.4Higher yield: CF 1.59% vs 0.62%Smaller drawdown: MLM -26.8% vs -29.2%Higher 5y return: CF +211.5% vs +42.4%
-15%0%+63%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CF · MLM

Year-by-year returns

YearCFMLM
2022+22.3%-22.7%
2023-4.7%+48.6%
2024+10.1%+4.1%
2025-7.2%+21.3%
2026+64.9%-14.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CF and MLM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, CF and MLM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CF and MLM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.53 over the last year and -0.02 over 5 years.

Is MLM a good diversifier for CF?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, CF and MLM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cf-vs-mlm.json

CF vs MLM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CF vs MLM-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CF vs MLM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cf-vs-mlm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cf-vs-mlm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CF correlations · MLM correlations