PairBook
HomeCF › CF vs MAKO

CF vs MAKO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CF Industries (CF) and Mako Mining Corp (MAKO) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-384.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CF and MAKO?

On 3 years of weekly data the CF/MAKO correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.31) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). The 5-year figure is -0.08, and annualized covariance runs at -384.2 %².

Within CF's tracked universe of 50 assets, MAKO comes in at #30 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MAKO ahead by 99.0 points (+48.6% versus +147.6%). One caveat on sizing: MAKO is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CF vs MAKO: side by side

CF (CF Industries)MAKO (Mako Mining Corp)
1-year return+48.6%+147.6%
5-year return+211.5%+320.0%
Volatility (ann.)32.8%57.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.201.23
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.2%-31.9%
Market cap$19.0B$1.0B
P/E (trailing)9.318.5
Dividend yield1.59%0.00%
Sector / categoryMaterialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: CF 9.3 vs 18.5Higher yield: CF 1.59% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CF -29.2% vs -31.9%Higher 5y return: MAKO +320.0% vs +211.5%
-8%0%+129%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CF · MAKO

Year-by-year returns

YearCFMAKO
2022+22.3%-67.7%
2023-4.7%+105.0%
2024+10.1%+7.8%
2025-7.2%+162.4%
2026+64.9%+88.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CF and MAKO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CF and MAKO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CF and MAKO?

The CF/MAKO correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.31, 5 years: -0.08), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MAKO a good diversifier for CF?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, CF and MAKO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cf-vs-mako.json

CF vs MAKO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CF vs MAKO-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CF vs MAKO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cf-vs-mako.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cf-vs-mako/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CF correlations · MAKO correlations