PairBook
HomeCDT › CDT vs GVH

CDT vs GVH: Correlation

How closely do CDT Equity Inc. (CDT) and Globavend Holdings Limited - Ord Shares (GVH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.32, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.52
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-29463.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDT and GVH?

Over the past 3 years, CDT and GVH moved with a correlation of -0.32, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.52) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.32). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -29463.3 %².

GVH is close to the least connected end of CDT's tracked universe, ranking #17 of 20. The last year tells two different stories: GVH led by 21.5 percentage points, -99.3% for CDT against -77.8% for GVH. Note the risk asymmetry: CDT runs 3.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDT vs GVH: side by side

CDT (CDT Equity Inc.)GVH (Globavend Holdings Limited - Ord Shares)
1-year return-99.3%-77.8%
5-year return-100.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)546.1%162.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.291.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-99.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GVH -99.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+41%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CDT · GVH

Year-by-year returns

YearCDTGVH
2023-55.6%
2024-98.5%-57.5%
2025-99.8%-98.9%
2026-94.1%-29.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDT and GVH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDT and GVH?

The CDT/GVH correlation stands at -0.32 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.52, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GVH a good diversifier for CDT?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdt-vs-gvh.json

CDT vs GVH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32CDT vs GVH-0.32

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CDT vs GVH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdt-vs-gvh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdt-vs-gvh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDT correlations · GVH correlations