PairBook
HomeCDT › CDT vs WLFC

CDT vs WLFC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CDT Equity Inc. (CDT) and Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) carry a correlation of -0.54, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.54
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.75
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
-18221.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDT and WLFC?

Over the past 3 years, CDT and WLFC moved with a correlation of -0.54, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.75 versus -0.54 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.50, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -18221.3 %².

Out of 20 assets tracked against CDT, WLFC lands near the bottom at #20. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WLFC ahead by 36.0 points (-99.3% versus -63.3%). Risk is not evenly split, since CDT carries 8.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDT vs WLFC: side by side

CDT (CDT Equity Inc.)WLFC (Willis Lease Finance Corporation)
1-year return-99.3%-63.3%
5-year return-100.0%+47.2%
Volatility (ann.)546.1%61.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.291.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-77.4%
Market cap$1.2B
P/E (trailing)13.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.88%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: WLFC 0.88% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WLFC -77.4% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: WLFC +47.2% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CDT · WLFC

Year-by-year returns

YearCDTWLFC
2022+56.7%
2023-55.6%-17.2%
2024-98.5%+327.3%
2025-99.8%-34.5%
2026-94.1%-59.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDT and WLFC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.54, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDT and WLFC?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.54 over 3 years, with -0.75 over the last year and -0.50 over 5 years.

Is WLFC a good diversifier for CDT?

Yes: at -0.54, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.54 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdt-vs-wlfc.json

CDT vs WLFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.54CDT vs WLFC-0.54

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CDT vs WLFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdt-vs-wlfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdt-vs-wlfc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDT correlations · WLFC correlations