PairBook
HomeCDNA › CDNA vs VXZ

CDNA vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CareDx, Inc. (CDNA) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.26
long-run
Ann. covariance
-552.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDNA and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CDNA and VXZ correlate at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.15) than the 3-year average (-0.26). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.26, with an annualized covariance of -552.6 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against CDNA, VXZ lands near the bottom at #9. The last year tells two different stories: CDNA led by 310.1 percentage points, +294.0% for CDNA against -16.1% for VXZ. Risk is not evenly split, since CDNA carries 3.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDNA vs VXZ: side by side

CDNA (CareDx, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+294.0%-16.1%
5-year return-35.0%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)83.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.46-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-66.0%-36.4%
Market cap$2.7B
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -66.0%Higher 5y return: CDNA -35.0% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+279%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CDNA · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCDNAVXZ
2022-74.9%+0.5%
2023+5.2%-44.0%
2024+78.4%-12.7%
2025-12.0%+5.7%
2026+177.9%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDNA and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CDNA and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDNA and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CDNA and VXZ is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.15 over 1 year and -0.26 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CDNA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, CDNA and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdna-vs-vxz.json

CDNA vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26CDNA vs VXZ-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CDNA vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdna-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdna-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDNA correlations · VXZ correlations