PairBook
HomeCDNA › CDNA vs JDZG

CDNA vs JDZG: Correlation

CareDx, Inc. (CDNA) and JIADE LIMITED - Class A (JDZG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4114.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CDNA and JDZG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CDNA and JDZG correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.04 versus -0.23 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -4114.3 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against CDNA, JDZG lands near the bottom at #8. The last year tells two different stories: CDNA led by 393.3 percentage points, +294.0% for CDNA against -99.3% for JDZG. Risk is not evenly split, since JDZG carries 3.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CDNA vs JDZG: side by side

CDNA (CareDx, Inc.)JDZG (JIADE LIMITED - Class A)
1-year return+294.0%-99.3%
5-year return-35.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)83.5%252.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.460.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-66.0%-100.0%
Market cap$2.7B
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CDNA -66.0% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+279%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CDNA · JDZG

Year-by-year returns

YearCDNAJDZG
2022-74.9%
2023+5.2%
2024+78.4%
2025-12.0%-88.0%
2026+177.9%-98.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CDNA and JDZG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, CDNA and JDZG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CDNA and JDZG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.04 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is JDZG a good diversifier for CDNA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, CDNA and JDZG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cdna-vs-jdzg.json

CDNA vs JDZG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CDNA vs JDZG-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CDNA vs JDZG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cdna-vs-jdzg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cdna-vs-jdzg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CDNA correlations · JDZG correlations