PairBook
HomeCD › CD vs GILD

CD vs GILD: Correlation

Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. - American (CD) and Gilead Sciences (GILD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-862.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CD and GILD?

Over the past 3 years, CD and GILD moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.03) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.19). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -862.8 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against CD, GILD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. The last year tells two different stories: GILD led by 73.9 percentage points, -39.8% for CD against +34.1% for GILD. Note the risk asymmetry: CD runs 7.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CD vs GILD: side by side

CD (Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. - American)GILD (Gilead Sciences)
1-year return-39.8%+34.1%
5-year return+1.2%+148.1%
Volatility (ann.)189.9%24.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.020.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.6%-26.6%
Market cap$0.4B$184.6B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%2.17%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: GILD 2.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GILD -26.6% vs -92.6%Higher 5y return: GILD +148.1% vs +1.2%
-53%0%+426%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CD · GILD

Year-by-year returns

YearCDGILD
2022-64.8%+23.6%
2023+109.5%-2.0%
2024+162.7%+18.7%
2025-27.2%+36.6%
2026-31.2%+22.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CD and GILD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, CD and GILD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CD and GILD?

The CD/GILD correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.03, 5 years: -0.12), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GILD a good diversifier for CD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.19, CD and GILD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cd-vs-gild.json

CD vs GILD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19CD vs GILD-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CD vs GILD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cd-vs-gild.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cd-vs-gild/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CD correlations · GILD correlations