PairBook
HomeCD › CD vs HALO

CD vs HALO: Correlation

How closely do Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. - American (CD) and Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.14
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1582.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CD and HALO?

Over the past 3 years, CD and HALO moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.14 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1582.0 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against CD, HALO sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. The last year tells two different stories: HALO led by 85.9 percentage points, -39.8% for CD against +46.1% for HALO. Risk is not evenly split, since CD carries 4.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CD vs HALO: side by side

CD (Chaince Digital Holdings Inc. - American)HALO (Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return-39.8%+46.1%
5-year return+1.2%+154.8%
Volatility (ann.)189.9%41.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.020.54
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.6%-33.9%
Market cap$0.4B$12.1B
P/E (trailing)31.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: HALO -33.9% vs -92.6%Higher 5y return: HALO +154.8% vs +1.2%
-53%0%+426%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CD · HALO

Year-by-year returns

YearCDHALO
2022-64.8%+41.5%
2023+109.5%-35.0%
2024+162.7%+29.4%
2025-27.2%+40.8%
2026-31.2%+58.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CD and HALO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CD and HALO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.14 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is HALO a good diversifier for CD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cd-vs-halo.json

CD vs HALO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20CD vs HALO-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CD vs HALO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cd-vs-halo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cd-vs-halo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CD correlations · HALO correlations