CCEL vs PSIG: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) and PS International Group Ltd. (PSIG) carry a correlation of 0.31, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CCEL and PSIG?
On 3 years of weekly data the CCEL/PSIG correlation comes out at 0.31, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.57) runs above the 3-year figure (0.31). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at 2359.2 %².
Few assets follow CCEL as closely as PSIG, which ranks #1 of 11 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: CCEL led by 50.3 percentage points, -3.6% for CCEL against -53.9% for PSIG. Note the risk asymmetry: PSIG runs 2.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CCEL vs PSIG: side by side
| CCEL (Cryo-Cell International, Inc.) | PSIG (PS International Group Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -3.6% | -53.9% |
| 5-year return | -53.4% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 55.4% | 157.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.21 | 0.97 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -66.3% | -96.0% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CCEL | PSIG |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -58.5% | – |
| 2023 | +35.9% | – |
| 2024 | +32.7% | – |
| 2025 | -50.6% | +8.3% |
| 2026 | +23.0% | -62.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CCEL and PSIG good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.31, CCEL and PSIG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CCEL and PSIG?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.31 over 3 years, with 0.57 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is PSIG a good diversifier for CCEL?
Reasonably. At 0.31, CCEL and PSIG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.31 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ccel-vs-psig.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ccel-vs-psig/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CCEL correlations · PSIG correlations
